Mar Joseph Kallarangatt
Bishop of Palai, Kerala, India
Sunday, 8 May 2016
Saturday, 7 May 2016
Biblical Reflection 116 (Mk. 16: 14-20)
The Commission to the Apostolate (Mk. 16: 14-20)
The irony is that those who at first did not believe became fathers of faith for all who would later believe (Augustine).
What the Apostles, themselves had seen and not believed, the Gentiles would later believe without seeing (Jerome).
The unity of the whole body of Christ derives from its continuity with the teachings of the Apostles (Tertullian).
The gifts of casting out demons were given not exclusively to the first apostolic generation but also to the continuing apostolate. Each believer receives gifts from the Father and Son through the Spirit according to each one’s capacity to receive (Ambrose).
There will be accompanying signs. These were needed at the Church’s beginnings. The new faith needed to be nourished by miracles to grow. When the elements of faith have taken deep roots in us, there is no need of continuing miracles (Gregory the Great).
Bishop Joseph Kallarangatt
Thursday, 5 May 2016
St. Kuriakose Chavara
Bishop Joseph Kallarangatt
India’s
true treasure is said to be lying in her mines of spirituality. Syro-Malabar
Church has proved herself her living capacity in this filed. Catholic Church has an ideal gallery and
galaxy of saints with a mosaic of different spiritual orientations. Each saint
has his or her own characteristic uniqueness and traits, distinguishing each
one from others, and revealing the nearness to God. Pope Benedict says: “the
saint is the person who is so fascinated by the beauty of God and by his
perfect truth as to be progressively transformed”. Saints are containers of faith, hope and love.
St.
Chavara was instrumental in founding the first indigenous religious
congregation of our country. He was a versatile genius who gave remarkable
leadership in the fields of religious life, education, printing, language
studies, literature and women empowerment. At the same time, he never projected
himself. St. Chavara could be considered as the godfather of print journalism
in Kerala. The printing press he founded in Mannanam after much painstaking
firsthand research eventually led to the publication of the first Malayalam
daily. This was indeed a giant leap: we have here the beginnings of the
dissemination and democratization of knowledge. (St. Chavara was a polyglot).
The activities of Chavara are something like a cardiography of the national and
religious struggle of our country of that time.
The
first half of the 19th century witnessed a raging debate as to the
best education policy for India. The two rival factions in this intellectual
fray were the Anglicists and the Orientalists. The Orientalists were in favour
of valorising the traditional language, culture and religion of India.
According to them the age old wisdom of our land could still be profitably utilized
after due adaptations. By founding a Sanskrit school in 1846 for the education
of Malabar Catholics, St. Chavara proved himself to be a first rate Orientalist.
Though the school was meant to further the educational opportunities of Syrian
Catholics, its portals were wide open for all students irrespective of caste,
creed or gender. The choice of Sanskrit as the language of instruction was
something revolutionary for the Christians. Admitting Dalit students to the
school was revolutionary for the society as such.
St.
Chavara was at once a Malpan (religious scholar) and a public intellectual. He
encouraged the Syrian Christians to apply themselves seriously to the study of
Syriac, which was by then largely neglected. He insisted that each parish has a
church, school and dispensary. He visualized houses with prayer rooms, studies
and dining rooms. The social and religious reformer in St. Chavara kindled two
revolutions, one of holiness and another of education. A Prior for sixteen long
years, he founded several new monasteries renewing thus the face of the Church.
According
to Christian tradition, every saint undertakes a twofold journey. 1. A journey
in search of the mystery of Christ. 2. A journey in search of the mystery of
the Church. It is through these endeavours that we delve into the deeper levels
of the reality that is man. That is how we enter with hope into the fundamental
principles of afterlife and eternity. It was as part of their search for Christ
and His Church that St. Chavara and St. Euphrasia rooted themselves firmly in
the fertile soil of religious life. Pope Francis says: if the Church loses
women, she risks becoming sterile. The twin Canonization is a fitting
recognition of the efficacious ministry of the Indian Carmelites to the
universal Church. The words of Pope Francis are inspiring: the Church is
carried forward by saints. They really bear witness to Christ. St. Euphrasia is actually the icon of
womanhood and sainthood. She has much to do in this contemporary world.
Chavara
Kuriakose was really a promoter of nation building. A nation is built on God’s
values and principles. It is the law of justice that keeps a nation steady and
strong. Chavara was a champion of this. He was a transforming fire. He purified
the society to a great extent. He was the conscience of the people of that
time. He has rejuvenated the secular society of his time. He himself was a
tradition that carries the past, present and future. Chavara always kept a
living philosophy of moulding the society by purifying the people from
injustice. The people enjoyed a rather easy oxygenation of the Gospel values
through his activities. There are many values in him that could be proudly
transmitted to the posterity. Actually Chavara became a nation builder through
the Gospel values and prayers. Chavara was a genius who respected the national
values of the county. Nation building is not a finished product. It is an
ongoing process. Dr. Ambedkar says: We can only attempt to become a nation in the
making.
Consecrated
life has always been relevant to the life of the Church. The Church can surely
boast of an uninterrupted tradition of consecrated persons from the first
centuries. The religious men and women play a unique role in the identity formation
of each Church sui iuris. Monasteries
ideally cater to the sanctity of the secular priests and the laity as well. The
Liturgy which is the supreme self-manifestation of the Church ought to be
celebrated in all its solemn perfection in monasteries. Fr. Chavara called the
Mannanam hills Beth rauma – a noble house set up on high. Really each
consecrated religious is like a holy house built on high. They purify the
Church by their simplicity and holiness, and not by their criticisms and pomp.
Fr. Kuriakose and Sr. Euphrasia are two religious leaders: a spiritual father
and a spiritual mother. Their spiritual fatherhood and motherhood were founded
on the Gospels. When we take them together there is a perfect blending of
Martha and Mary. In our times there is a dearth of spiritual fathers and
mothers. We may accept these two saints as two unique ways for new
evangelization. They were both fearless to the core. They were never tired of
proclaiming Jesus. Both of them have expressed the pastoral fatherhood and the
pastoral motherhood of the Church. The three saints -Alphonsa, Chavara and
Euphraisa are the three attractions of the time. The Gospel spreads by
attraction. Evangelization is by attraction. All the three were incarnation of
prayers. They correct the Martha complex in us and they are the reminders of
our spiritual Alzheimer.
Pope
Francis: When we face challenges together, then we are strong. Then we discover
resources we do not know we had. Jesus did not call the apostles to live in
isolation. He called them to form a group, a community. This enabled Chavara to
start religious congregations.
Gopalkrishna
Gandhi wrote on Rajagopalachari (CR): He was abashedly God minded and pious,
placing his talents and time very consciously on the altar of reverential belief.
He wrote on Scripture as a sacrament, on politics as a duty, on social issues
as an obligation. He wrote on Gandhi as Mk, Mt, Lk, Jn and Paul wrote on the
prince of Nazareth Jesus Christ. In a similar way whatever St. Chavara has
written is golden.
Wednesday, 4 May 2016
“Build My Church”: Aedificabo Ecclesiam Meam (Mt 16, 18)
Bishop Joseph Kallarangatt
The choice of the name indicates the pastoral
priority of the new pontiff. By choosing the name Francis, the new Pope
projects St. Francis of Assisi as a model both for the Church as an institution
and for all her individual members.
In Pope Francis, the Ignatian reaches out to embrace
the Franciscan. As a Jesuit, the Pope received a solid grounding in a wide
range of social and physical sciences including chemistry, literature and
psychology, besides philosophy and theology. This rigorous intellectual
training will lend breadth and depth to his magisterium. His pronounced social
commitment too is part of his Jesuit legacy. His Holiness is known to have an
eye for the poor and the disenfranchised – ubi
amor ibi oculos.
By choosing the name Francis the Holy Father makes a
pilgrimage to the heart of the Gospel. Upon his calling, St. Francis received
the task of rebuilding the Church. Every Roman Pontiff receives the same
mandate – to rebuild the church – according to the needs of the time while
making the Gospel as the definitive touchstone. It is in this process of
continual rebuilding that the transmission of faith and new evangelization
happen. When the Vatican ІІ mooted the idea of ressourcement, it was really meant to be a return to the simplicity
of the gospel.
The election of a Pope from South America is a
veritable expression of the catholicity of the Church. By their choice, the
Cardinal electors cast their net deep – duc
in altum. The new Pontiff is a bridge between continents, between peoples,
between cultures, between men and God.
The frugal life style of the new Bishop of Rome is
already proverbial. His simple life style is not an end in itself. It is rather
his way of being close to the people entrusted to his care. The charming
personality of the new Pope and his credible life witness will encourage many disaffected catholics to once again
cherish their mother Church – a Church sine
macula sine ruga.
Franciscan spirituality is championed today by a
host of lay movements like the Franciscan Third Order. It may be earnestly
hoped that the tenure of Pope Francis will witness a burgeoning of lay theology
and apostolate. Let us wish and pray that the start of the new Pontificate will
usher in an era of Peace and Joy.
Nunc Dimittis of Benedict XVI
Bishop Joseph Kallarangatt
When
His Holiness Benedict XVI renounced the ministry of Bishop of Rome, Successor
to the Apostle Peter we saw in him the mind of Christ who “He emptied himself”
(Phil 2: 7). He lives Gospel: “we are unworthy servants; we have only done what
was our duty” (Lk 17:10), “Whoever wishes to be great among you shall be your
servant; whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave” (Mt 20: 26,
27). In Benedict XVI’s words “a simple and humble worker in the Lord’s
vineyard” we hear the echo of words of Mary, mother of God and mother of the
Church “behold I am the handmaid of the Lord” (Lk 1:38). In Benedict’s act we
see a continuity with John the Baptist: “He must increase; I must decrease” (Jn
3:30). His renunciation is a nunc
dimittis. He teaches us to be detached and to be of pure heart; he teaches
us how to face with serenity the difficult moments in life. Like Simeon bearing
Christ in his arms and heart, His Holiness Benedict also prays to let him go in
peace (Lk 2: 29).
As
an authority of St. Augustine, His Holiness Benedict XVI has digested the
dictum of St. Augustine: ‘Verbo
crescente, verba deficiunt’- ‘When the Word of God increases, the words of
men fail’. As a lover of the Word of God, he wants to sit by the Word without
much talk. He is convinced that silence, contemplation and prayer are the best
ways for the new evangelization. The words of Origen are very dear to His
Holiness: ‘accendat ardor proximos’-‘Let
the ardour ignite the neighbour’. By this renunciation, the Benedict XVI has
actually ignited everybody. He showed himself to be closer to the
inextinguishable fire. His Holiness Benedict XVI is a ‘Benedictine’. He chose
the name Benedict to revive the importance of the holy monk’s rule of life
centred on the principle that ‘Christo
nihil omnino praeponere’- nothing must come before Christ. St Benedict is
sometimes called the master of humility and his rule has become a classic on
humility. His Holiness Benedict has followed his namesake in letter and spirit.
It was in the light of the Benedictine spirit ‘Mens nostra concordat voci nostrae’ –‘let our minds coincide with
our words’, that His Holiness Benedict has announced his renunciation and
manifested his will.
As
a theologian who finds the real spirit of liturgy His Holiness Benedict XVI
lives the axiom ‘lex orandi, lex
credendi, lex vivendi’. He believes in the supremacy of prayer and for him
prayer is an immersion in God. He is convinced that prayer governs the world.
For Benedict XVI, to believe is to entrust oneself to God and to accept God
totally. In its literal sense ‘to believe’ (credere
= cor + dare) signifies ‘giving one’s heart’. The first of all commandments
is “to love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all
your mind and with all your strength” (Mk 12: 30). By this renunciation
Benedict XVI becomes a witness to faith, a martyr.
It
is definitely the case that Benedict XVI is fully aware that he is setting a
new precedent. Rather than resorting to theories of intrigue we should let
Benedict XVI speak for himself. His Holiness’ carefully drafted renunciation
letter deserves a serious study. He expresses his current state of mind, his
deep appreciation for his predecessor and his dream for the future bishop of
Rome. As for himself, Benedict XVI is convinced of his inadequacy on health
grounds to continue as the Successor of Peter. At the same time he acknowledges
with humility that his immediate predecessor chose a more courageous path, that
of suffering to continue his mission till his last breath. In the text
announcing his renunciation His Holiness Benedict XVI himself gives us an
indication regarding the profile of his successor: “However in today’s world,
subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions of deep relevance for
the life of faith, in order to govern the barque of St. Peter and proclaim the
Gospel, both strength of mind and body are necessary”.
The
renunciation of Benedict XVI is a commentary on the documents of Vatican II
from ‘within’. Vatican II was held when there was a transition from the
monarchical to the democratic type of administration in the secular fields. But
the Church is more than a democratic society. It is a communion and it is
governed in a collegial spirit. The decision to step down is a courageous,
spiritual act. From his part it is an act of humility and conscience. But
because of the communion aspect of the Church it is actually we who are humbled
by this ecclesial and personal act. What is characteristic of this renunciation
is the typical German ethos. It has acquired an event character. He sees in it a beauty which we cannot see
perhaps. He has a vision which we cannot fully understand now. Actually by his
renunciation Benedict XVI teaches the world the spirituality and asceticism of
the cross. Benedict XVI wants to remain in a new way near to the crucified Lord.
He retreats from the crowd and turns versus
crucem (towards the cross). It is a ‘death’ unto ‘glory’. What his
predecessor did was equally courageous. They both arrived at different
decisions through the same drive and commitment for the good of the Church.
What is central to papacy is now increasingly clear. The Pope is servus servorum Dei.
By
his renunciation Benedict XVI actually clings to the knees of Jesus as Peter
did. The exit and the entry of a Pontiff are only two high points in the
history of the Church. What is pivotal is the uninterrupted flow of tradition
typified by the Roman Pontiff. By withdrawing from papacy His Holiness Benedict
brought it into the limelight. Christianity became a hot topic in secular
media. His act of renunciation thus became a mode of new evangelization.
His
Holiness Benedict XVI’s decision should not weigh over his successors. They
should not be forced to do what Benedict XVI did in full freedom.
By
his act of renouncing, Benedict XVI is neither isolating himself from the world
nor abandoning the church. Rather he wants to be united with us all through
prayer. His Holiness Benedict enters into silence. Silence is the symbol of the
world to come. His life in the monastery will be a continuous protection for
the church and the world like a lightening arrester. Now the words of the
Psalmist are fulfilled in the life of His Holiness Benedict XVI: “There is no
word or sound; no voice is heard; yet their report goes forth all the earth,
their message to the ends of the earth” (Ps 19: 4, 5).
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)